his background and expertise
enhance his testimony and in no way indicate that he is speaking officially for
the Club. His testimony focused somewhat narrowly on the 9 roadheads for which
cherry stems (access into an otherwise prohibited area) are not provided in the
bill. When I was Chair of the Desert Peaks Section, we initiated workshops with
Judy Anderson and other Sierra Club drafters of the Desert Bill, workshops in
which Dale Van Dalsem and other DPS leaders participated specifically to ensure
that the Bill would provide cherry stems for DPS peaks so that the peaks would
not become inaccessible to all but the strongest hikers and backpackers. This
was a legitimate concern and was accepted as such by Sierra Club drafters of
the bill at the time. Seeing that these cherry stems were not provided for in
8-21, Dale was attempting again to protect the DPS interest in reasonable
access to peaks it traditionally climbs. Van Dalsem did work responsibly
within the Club to change the provisions of the Desert Bill, and he, like
others of us, thought that the changes had gone through. But seeing that they
had not, he testified as an individual, seeking specific relief. The personal
nature of the attacks mounted by Vicky Hoover and others against Dale seems
quite uncalled for--if only the attackers had put their letters aside for a day
or two, then read them over and deleted the unnecessarily hurtful adjectives
before sending them! |
The L.A. Story: Poverty, Despair and
Overpopulation by Sam Popowsky, Mark Schoen &
Julie Beezley |
The Amersterdam Resolution of 1989
(see the Please Write section) which addresses poverty issues as well as
increasing access to family planning programs has spoken eloquently. "The
population issue," says the Resolution, "is an intrinsic part of general
economic and social development." Increasingly, other nations are recognizing
the link between population stabilization and a better life. We need to do that
here in the United States. In fact, the U.S., is the only major western country
which lacks a national population program. Unfortunately, our leaders have
little experience or insight into the relationship between overpopulation and
social turmoil. What of the future? The riots in Los Angeles were only one
small image in a worldwide montage of the miseries of overpopulation. Will good
deeds, so evident after the fires, give way to despair about the political
process? Recognition that overpopulation is destroying us will be hard woo. The
political process does work hot we can't expect that we will magically get our
way. The Sierra Club's population group knows that many environmentalists
still need to be convinced that overpopulation is a root cause of social (and
environmental) decline. Those chosen to work on Rebuild L.A. most likely
understand this connection even less. The destruction in Los Angeles is
connected to the population explosion. We need to see that we live on a finite
planet. We are the visionaries who know that a better world can only be assured
by population stabilization. Spread the word. |
We saw the images on television and
felt despair. Overpopulation was not on the minds of those who burned or looted
in April. However, as we know, one result of overpopulation is more unwanted
and neglected children, living impoverished lives with no decent means of
support. These are children who become angry when they see no way out. This
downward spiral is then repeated, as each generation's problems grow larger
than the one before. The result is violence, crime and the breakdown of the
family. Only despair can follow. Now we see society looking for the quick
fix, which also contributes to social decline. More people are thrown in to
already overcrowded jails, and we cough up the minimum amounts of money
necessary to produce good news copy for the masses. Later we fail to follow up
when progress is slow and always seem to skirt the difficult issues of social
justice. These problems are clearly compounded by too many people. Too many
unwanted people sealed in a life of poverty: the root cause of the violence and
despair which we just witnessed. In the third world many more unplanned and
often unwanted children are born into a world where poverty is even worse than
here. That gap is beginning to close. Bare survival and starvation are becoming
a worldwide problem. |
|